Former U.S. President Donald Trump has signed a new executive order that restricts transgender athletes from competing in girls’ and women’s sports. The directive, issued on Wednesday, states that educational institutions permitting transgender women and girls to take part in female sports categories or use female locker rooms will lose eligibility for federal funding.

Trump Signs Executive Order Restricting Transgender Athletes in Female Sports

The order underscores the administration’s position that sports participation should be based strictly on biological sex, a move that has reignited debate across the country about fairness, inclusion, and gender identity in athletics.

In a statement, Trump warned, “We are putting every school receiving taxpayer dollars on notice: If you let men take over women’s sports teams or invade your locker rooms, you will be investigated for Title IX violations and risk losing federal funding.” Title IX, enacted in 1972, prohibits sex-based discrimination in educational institutions.

Trump declared that his administration was ending what he called “the war on women’s sports,” asserting that he would not “stand by and watch men beat and batter female athletes.” The decision has sparked heated debate — critics argue that it unfairly discriminates against transgender individuals, while supporters contend it preserves the integrity of women’s competition.

The former president also vowed to enforce the policy aggressively, stating, “We’re not going to let it happen anymore. It’s ending right now — and nobody can stop it.”

Additionally, Trump announced plans to urge the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to adopt similar sex-based participation rules ahead of the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. The IOC currently allows international sports federations to set their own policies regarding transgender participation. Trump criticized this approach, calling it “absolutely ridiculous” and insisting that global sports organizations must “change everything” related to the issue.

The executive order marks a significant escalation in Trump’s broader campaign to position his policies as protecting women’s sports, even as advocacy groups condemn the move as a violation of transgender rights and a step backward for inclusivity in athletics.

Debate Over Transgender Athletes Intensifies as Opposition Grows Despite Limited Participation

The participation of transgender women in sports has become one of the most contentious issues in U.S. cultural and political discourse — even though the actual number of athletes affected remains extremely small. During testimony before a U.S. Senate hearing in December 2023, NCAA President Charlie Baker revealed that fewer than 10 transgender athletes compete among the organization’s 520,000 college athletes nationwide.

Despite these limited figures, public resistance to the inclusion of transgender women in female sports has surged in recent years, fueled in part by high-profile controversies such as that of Lia Thomas, the collegiate swimmer who won an NCAA Division I championship in 2022 before being barred from women’s competitions by World Aquatics, the international governing body for swimming.

A 2023 Gallup poll highlights the changing sentiment: 69% of Americans now believe that transgender athletes should compete only on teams that align with their sex assigned at birth—a seven-point increase from 2021.

The issue continues to sharply divide public opinion. Supporters of inclusion argue that transgender women deserve equal opportunities to participate in sports, emphasizing fairness and dignity. Opponents, however, insist that sex-based categories are essential to preserve competitive balance and protect the integrity of women’s athletics.

As the debate intensifies, policymakers, sports organizations, and advocacy groups remain deeply split on how to balance inclusivity, fairness, and biological differences within competitive sports.

NCAA Responds to Trump’s Executive Order on Transgender Athletes as Advocacy Groups Condemn Policy

The NCAA has reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining consistent eligibility standards for college athletes in response to former President Donald Trump’s new executive order, which restricts transgender participation in women’s and girls’ sports.

“We strongly believe that clear, consistent, and uniform eligibility standards best serve student-athletes, rather than a confusing mix of state laws and court rulings,” said NCAA President Charlie Baker in a statement.

Baker noted that the NCAA Board of Governors is currently reviewing the implications of the executive order and will revise policies accordingly once it receives further clarification from federal authorities. He reiterated that the NCAA remains devoted to ensuring inclusive environments for all student-athletes, regardless of gender identity.

However, LGBTQ advocacy groups have denounced the move, warning that it would further marginalize transgender youth. Athlete Ally, an organization promoting LGBTQ inclusion in sports, criticized the order as “a harmful step backward” that denies young transgender athletes the opportunity to compete as their “authentic selves.”

“We knew this was coming — an administration pushing oversimplified solutions to complex human issues while fueling hostility toward marginalized groups,” Athlete Ally said, pledging to continue advocating for inclusivity in athletics.

GLAAD, one of the largest LGBTQ rights organizations in the U.S., also condemned the order, calling it “misguided and incoherent.” The group stated, “All women and girls — including transgender women and girls — deserve the right to play sports, make their own health decisions, pursue their careers, and live free from politically motivated discrimination.”

The executive order has reignited a deep national divide over gender, sports, and fairness. Supporters claim the policy ensures uniformity and protects women’s athletics, while critics argue it represents a regressive attack on transgender rights.

Since taking office on January 20, Trump has issued four executive orders restricting transgender rights, including:

A proclamation recognizing only two sexes,

A ban on transgender individuals serving openly in the military,

A policy blocking federal funding for gender-affirming care for minors,

And the latest order targeting transgender participation in female sports.

LGBTQ rights advocates have accused the administration of weaponizing policy against vulnerable communities, warning that these actions deepen discrimination rather than address fairness.

“Politicians who have spent years undermining women’s rights and health care have no credibility when claiming to protect them now,” one advocacy group stated.

As legal challenges mount, the debate over transgender inclusion in sports continues to expose the growing tension between policies framed around “biological definitions” and the broader fight for LGBTQ equality in the United States.

References